about us my profile contact us
CARET Home Center for Applied Research in Educational Technology
header photo collage
rule
Home Questions & Answers:  Questions:  Answers:  Research Evidence

TOPIC: Student Learning

Q: How can technology influence student academic performance?

A: Technology improves performance when the application is integrated into the typical instructional day.

RESEARCH EVIDENCE

Kulik (2003) found that computer simulations (p.59) and Instructional Learning Systems (ILS) (p.25) are effective only when they are integrated into the “regular classroom instruction.” In the case of ILS, it is particularly critical to allow students “an adequate amount of time on the programs” (p.24).

The level of technology used by the teacher significantly affected student academic achievement in mathematics in a comparison of fourth and fifth grade teachers and their students. Students whose teachers were high level users of technology in the classroom scored significantly better than did students whose teachers were low level users of technology in the classroom. Teachers who were high level users were differentiated from teachers who were low level users in terms of frequency and extent of use of computers with students, instructional methods used with technology, attitude toward the value of technology for learning, variety of uses of technology, and perception of influence of technology on student learning and behavior (Middleton & Murray, 1999).

It is important that teachers know that students can manipulate the software to achieve a visual solution without conceptual understanding of how the problem is solved. Numerous studies document student understanding of mathematics concepts from using computer-based and -assisted software. Logo programming, computer-assisted instruction (CAI) microworlds, and algebra and geometry software have been effective in facilitating mathematics achievement for elementary, middle, and high school students when teachers are skilled in guiding student activities (Simmons & Cope, 1990, 1993; Hillel, Kieran, & Gurtner, 1989; McCoy, 1996).

Classroom use of computer applications was demonstrated to be more effective than lab use for teaching mathematics. A set of fifth grade students had access to computers with standards-based software in their classrooms, along with teacher-led standards-based instruction (Basic Skills/Computer Education). These students had higher gains overall and in math on achievement tests than did students who experienced the same curricula and technology in lab settings (Mann et al., 1999).

Computer-assisted instruction can be effective when used in laboratories when emphasizing teaching of basic skills. In a study of reading and mathematics achievement among Chapter 1 students in Grades 2-6, experimental groups used Education Systems Corporation (ESC) software in computer laboratories twice per week during a period of one school year. Chapter 1 students who did have access to the computer laboratories demonstrated significant increases in achievement both in reading and in mathematics (Zollman et al., 1989).

REFERENCES

* = Reviewed in CARET

Hillel, J., Kieran, C., & Gurtner, J. (1989). Solving structured geometry tasks on the computer: The role of feedback in generating strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 1-39.

* Kulik, J. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say. Arlington, Virginia: SRI International. Retrieved October 3, 2003 from http://www.sri.com/policy/csted/reports/sandt/it/Kulik_ITinK-12_Main_Report.pdf
[go to CARET review]


* Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1998). West Virginia story: Achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.
[go to CARET review]


* McCoy, L., P., (1996). Computer-based mathematics learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 438-460.
[go to CARET review]


Middleton, B. M. & Murray, R. K. (1999). The impact of instructional technology on student academic achievement in reading and mathematics. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 109.

Simmons, M., & Cope, P. (1990). Fragile knowledge of angle in turtle geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 375-382.

Simmons, M., & Cope, P. (1993). Angle and rotation: Effects of different types of feedback on the quality of response. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 163-176.

Zollman, A., Oldham, B., & Wyrick, J. (1989). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on reading and mathematics achievement of Chapter 1 students. Resources in Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 024).

OTHER RESOURCES

* = Reviewed in CARET

There are currently no supplementary resources listed for this answer.


Submit another topic or question
 
rule

CARET is a project of the International Society for Technology in Education in partnership with Educational Support Systems. CARET was founded in 2000 with a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Copyright ©2005